Canadiens-Senators: Brilliant Special Teams Lead Habs to Win

3
78


Montreal 4 Ottawa 1 (Scotiabank Place)

posted by Rocket
All Habs

Early this season, on these pages, it was forecasted that Canadiens’ fans were in for a rollercoaster of a ride following this team. Not to say, we told you so but is there a better word to describe the path of the Habs?

Even recently, the Habs were shutout by the Leafs and then dominated the Bruins. Last night, the Canadiens limited the Flyers to 15 shots on goal. Tonight, the Senators managed 46 shots.

So what is going on?

The inconsistency is a combination of many things: injuries, changing personnel, and players trying to adapt to a new system. But perhaps the biggest reason is that Jacques Martin’s system is passive and reactive. The style of play is often dictated by the opposition.

Tonight, Ottawa was in the mood to shoot. The Senators outshot the Habs 13-to-5 in the first period. Despite the disparity, scoring chances were about even. The Canadiens held a 1-0 lead after one period as Mike Cammalleri converted a 2-on-1 feed from Tomas Plekanec.

Ottawa tied the game early in the second period. Mike Fisher was left all alone in front with Josh Gorges caught out of position off chasing the puck. Gorges has not been playing good positional hockey since the Washington game.

About a minute later, the Canadiens took the first of their seven minor penalties.

It was up to the penalty-killers to keep the game close by shutting down the Ottawa power-play. They killed off Georges Laraque’s two-minute minor. They would repeat the feat six more times during the game.

Plekanec with Travis Moen were up front on the first wave of the penalty-killing unit followed by the pairing of Scott Gomez and Sergei Kostitsyn. Roman Hamrlik, Ryan O’Byrne, Hal Gill and Gorges were on defense. All were superb.

The Canadiens have now killed off 22 straight penalties in December.

Perry Pearn, Montreal’s assistant coach, credited the the penalty killers for not giving up many second shot opportunities, and for playing with desperation.

It was left then for the other component of the Canadiens special teams, the power play, to do their part. The Habs scored two power-play goals on three opportunities. Marc-Andre Bergeron and Andrei Kostitsyn were the goal scorers with Plekanec assisting on both, giving him three for the game.

“Plecks is playing really well. He’s creating a lot and we’re getting a lot of production as a result,” said his linemate, Cammalleri.

The Canadiens’ special teams were complimented with solid goaltending by Jaroslav Halak. Halak was busy throughout but reserved his best saves for the third period. It was a great rebound game for Halak after a poor performance against the Sabres.

“The specialty teams were really the difference in the game tonight,” said coach Martin. “Jaro came in and gave us a strong game. Everyone that played on the specialty teams did an outstanding job because we had a lot of penalties to kill.”

Tonight’s victory was even more satisfying as the Canadiens were playing with a short bench.

Jaroslav Spacek was struck in the back of the leg with a Alex Kovalev shot at the end of the first period. Spacek did not return to the game.

Ryan White played 3:26 in the first period and then was pulled from the ice by the NHL. They claimed that his call-up paperwork from Hamilton had not been properly filed with the league earlier in the day.

Max Pacioretty and Sergei Kostitsyn also spent time in the dressing room with injury concerns but returned to finish the game.

Productive special teams play and good goaltending are an effective combination that the Canadiens should try to model each game.

The Canadiens will return home to face the Penguins on Thursday night.

Rocket’s three stars

1. Tomas Plekanec
2. Jaroslav Halak
3. Roman Hamrlik

Special mentions: Mike Fisher, Ryan O’Byrne

(photo credit: Getty)

3 COMMENTS

  1. I really do wonder what Martin is teaching the team. It's not that I'm overly concerned about the number of shots against (I'm more concerned with scoring chances), but I really want to hear him explain how a puck possession team gives up 46 shots.

    I also understand that losing Spacek, Mara and other players on a seemingly constant basis doesn't help either, but still. This does not make sense.

    Kudos to Halak and Plekanec for playing terrific games; especially the backup goalie who was less than spectacular in his last start vs Buffalo. It is still evident that this team will only go so far as the goaltenders can take them. The goaltending this year is solely responsible for at least 4 victories this season so far. I don't know whether to be buoyed by that, or concerned.

    I'm really hoping this team can put up a better fight against Pittsburgh. They put in a great effort 2 weeks back, but one thing is for sure: giving Crosby and Malkin the space and time to generate 46 shots will lead to a very ugly outcome!

    PS – Are Kovalev and Spezza's faces appearing on milk cartons in Ottawa yet?

  2. Your parting question is a good one. I think that coach Clouston is asking the same thing. It was interesting to see that Kovalev was benched for one of the Senators power play chances in the third period.

    As far as the Canadiens, I would really like to see them adopt an identity, preferably a more aggressive one, and stick to it.

    Martin's passive system is not as amateurish as Carbonneau's 'line five guys up across the blueline' but it is allowing teams an easy path through the neutral zone.

  3. It seems to me that just about any coach from any level can coach what Martin at times seems to be coaching, i.e.: Let them shoot from everywhere and hope the goalie makes the saves. I truly thought that given his track record, Martin would come to town and at the very least, cut down the shots against, which has not been the case.

    Like I said, I think scoring chances is a better indicator than shots against, but sooner or later giving up that many shots will wear a team out as they chase rebounds and try to repel crashing attackers.

    Doesn't this sound like the opposite of how a puck possession team would play?

Comments are closed.