Home Feature Tomas Plekanec: Worth Every Penny of his Contract

Tomas Plekanec: Worth Every Penny of his Contract

4
Tomas Plekanec: Worth Every Penny of his Contract

by Kristina Ashqar, AllHabs.net

“I think it was clear that Plekanec would be signed for his two way ability and the reliance Martin put on him all year. But I think $5 million a year for six years is too much cash when you compare him to a guy like Ryan Kesler who has the exact same contract…but is three inches taller, bigger, more gritty and has an easier time handling bigger and better defencemen in the NHL. I hope we continue to see the Pleks of this year and not the “little girl” of the year before for the duration of his contract.” — Kristina Ashqar, June 23, 2010.

MONTREAL, QC.–Well, ten games into the Montreal Canadiens season, it is obvious that my assessment when Tomas Plekanec signed his six year contract this past summer was dead wrong. Not only has the “little girl” of the 2008 – 2009 season with her 39 points been completely obliterated, the player who has emerged is arguably one of the best centers in the NHL.

It is without question that Plekanec had his breakout year in 2009-2010. With 25 goals and 45 assists, Pleks’ career-high 70 points made him the best Montreal Canadien on the ice for the duration of the season. His consistency, ability to see the ice and set up his teammates to generate offense, and his dominance on the penalty kill and powerplay are what gave Plekanec the opportunity to sign on the dotted line for a new contract worth $30 million in the off-season.

So before I throw my comments from last summer under the bus for being completely asinine, allow me to explain since hindsight is always 20-20.

Back in the 2009-2010 season, Ryan Kesler was the third leading scoring on the Vancouver Canucks behind the Sedin twins. He racked up 25 goals and 50 assists for 75 points in 82 games played.  He scored more than Plekanec and averaged about about two shifts fewer per game. Kesler’s size, toughness, ability to score and be a play maker made him a center that was vital to the support of the Canucks’ top two stars. In the eyes of GM Mike Gillis, Kesler had proven himself to be someone the Canucks organization could not go without and he signed a six year, $30 million contract extension on March 19, 2010.

So when the Canadiens traded Halak to make room to sign Plekanec for the exact same contract, the basis of comparison seemed logical: both were two-way players, both were essential on the power-play and the penalty-kill, both were there to support the number one line (at least at the time the Gomez line was the number one line), both scored at least 70 points in the year, and both held a similar role. If you looked at the two players side by side, Kesler seemed to win on three main attributes: three inches taller, almost two years younger, and not afraid to drop the gloves. But the Canadiens forwent those attributes and paid Plekanec exactly what Kesler was making.

But that was June 23, 2010. If you asked me today, I would tell you that I am 100% ok with the decision made by Pierre Gauthier and the Montreal Canadiens management.

With ten games played, Plekanec continues to be the Habs’ most dominant player. His five goals and five assists rank him 19th in the league in scoring and he has played inspired hockey on both ends of the ice. Plekanec’s ability to set up his teammates and finish has already been showcased this season in fine fashion:

  1. Game 2 vs. Penguins: Plekanec carries the puck into the offensive zone from the Habs’ blue line, wraps his way around the net and finds Cammalleri in the slot for a slap shot past Fleury that happened so fast Bob Cole didn’t even realize the Canadiens scored.
  2. Game 3 vs. Lightning: Cammalleri picks up his own rebound off the pads of Mike Smith and finds a wide open Plekanec who rips a shot so hard he just about burns a whole in the netting.
  3. Game 3 vs. Lightning: Plekanec steals the puck in the neutral zone from defensemen Mike Lundin for a two on one with AK46  and feeds a beautiful pass under the stick of Pavel Kubina for an easy backhand goal.
  4. Game 5 vs. Senators: AK46 takes the puck off Regin at center ice and Plekanec sets him up on a nifty give and go play to give Kostitsyn his second goal of the year.
  5. Game 5 vs. Senators: Plekanec follows up with his first game winning goal of the season, benefiting from a rebound given up by Elliott as AK46 crashes the net on the two on two play.
  6. Game 7 vs. Senators: Plekanec carries the puck from the blue line along the boards, drives towards the net and gets tied up by Gonchar, yet he still manages to feed AK46 a one hand pass for a top corner snipe.
  7. Game 8 vs. Coyotes: A recipient of a juicy rebound given up by Bryzgalov on an AK46 shot after a flurry of pressure, Plekanec pops the puck into a wide open net.
  8. Game 9 vs. Islanders: Trying to kill of a penalty, Plekanec pushes the puck past Doug Weight at the blue line for a  two on one with Travis Moen where Pleks feeds a perfectly placed pass for the team’s first shorthanded goal of the season.
  9. Game 9 vs. Islanders: Hamrlik throws the puck to Plekanec just before the Islander blueline. Pleks feeds a touch pass to AK46 along the boards and he gives the puck back to No. 14 as he skates into the slot and sends a rocket passed Roloson into the top left corner of the net.
  10. Game 10 vs. Islanders: Standing in the right place at the right time, Plekanec picks up a rebound from a Cammalleri shot at the side of the net and makes a nifty move to backhand the puck past Roloson for his first power play goal of the year.

In addition to getting points on the scoresheet, Plekanec’s contribution on the penalty kill was epitomized on 5-on-3 the Habs had to kill off against the Islanders in game 10. You also can’t forget the missed opportunities to score on beautiful set-up plays drawn up by Plekanec. For all these reasons, Tomas Plekanec is worth every penny he is making.

Oh, and in case you are interested, Ryan Kesler has four points in nine games played…

4 COMMENTS

  1. Five enlightened choices = cup

    If I was the Habs GM since 2003… the team would be the favourites to win the Stanley Cup this year…
    By drafting properly in the first round between 2003 and 2007, the Habs would be alarmingly better than the reality we see today… if the Habs would have made just five different 1st round selections …
    So, instead of Andrei Kostitsyn in 2003, they could have had Zach Parise; instead of Kyle Chipchura in 2004 they could have had Mike Green; instead of Carey Price in 2005 they should have drafted Anze Kopitar, instead of David Fisher (this one really hurts), they could have had Claude Giroux in 2006, and they made two selections, Ryan McDonagh and Max Pacioretty, which they could have used to take David Perron in 2007.

    By drafting more wisely, they wouldn’t have had to trade for Scott Gomez’s gigantic longterm contract that eats up valuable cap space, wouldn’t have had to waste their time signing (over paid and over the hill) Jaroslav Spacek, … and they wouldn’t have had to give away Jaroslav Halak in a fire-sale trade this past summer. You can try and argue that Gionta or Cammalleri wouldn’t have signed last year without Gomez in tow, but that would be stupid… in my ‘what if’ lineup, we would have three centres that would guarantee playoff dominance …

    Centre Left Wing Right Wing
    Anze Kopitar Michael Cammalleri Brian Gionta
    Zach Parise David Perron Claude Giroux
    Thomas Plekanec Benoit Pouliot Maxim Lapierre
    Jeff Halpern Travis Moen Mathieu Darche
    Dustin Boyd

    Defence
    Andrei Markov, Mike Green,
    PK. Subban, Roman Hamrlik
    Josh Gorges, Hall Gill
    Ryan O’Byrne, Alexandre Picard

    Goalies
    Jaroslav Halak
    Alex Auld

    • I admit, I have never found any value in these type of exercises — going back up to 7 years and making decisions based on the accumulated information during that time. I find the whole process rather disingenuous. However, let me play along for now and make a few points.

      If you were GM of the Canadiens, your first stop would be to Gary Bettman to argue why you should be given permission to be at least $2 million over the salary cap with your specified lineup. Good luck with that discussion.

      Your next stop (and I personally advise against this one) would be to visit Mike Cammalleri and Brian Gionta accusing them of being “stupid” (your word) for saying that they wouldn’t have signed with Montreal without the Scott Gomez trade.

      I’d also have to wonder, given your record of perfect decisions, why a slug like Mathieu Darche is on your team given that he is an AHL-caliber player?

      I’d also have to question, given a perfect drafting history, why you would have taken Maxim Lapierre (7G, 7A last year) in 2003 when you could have drafted Joe Pavelski (25G, 26A), Lee Stempniak (28G, 20A), Dustin Byfuglien (17G, 17A), or Matt Moulson (30G, 18A)?

      Better still you could have drafted Jimmy Howard (instead of Lapierre), a goaltender who had a much better GAA and 11 more wins than your beloved Halak last season.

      For now I’ll set aside any comments about Benoit Pouliot, and others. I appreciate that you have given this some thought, and for some it is a fun exercise to look back. I really don’t intend my criticism to be harsh. However, no one should fool themselves that such a simplistic swap of names is meaningful.

  2. It is very easy to sit back in your seat as a fan and say what you would have done or could have done if you were the GM of the Montreal Canadiens. I once learned that hindsight is not admissible in assessing any one decision taken at a point in time. So to come out and basically say that drafting Andrei Kostitsyn was a poor choice over the likes of Parise, Geztlaf etc. etc. is fruitless and not to mention a no-brainer now.

    But who knew with 100% certainty at the time that the latter players would far surpass the former in terms of consistent play and competitive drive. Nobody.

    Although we all may not agree with the decisions and choices made by management, we should all give them the benefit of the doubt that they perform their due diligence at the time when decisions are made.

    Your time may be better spent elsewhere rather than playing the shoulda, woulda, coulda game.

    • I was just trying to point out how a handful of
      choices at the draft over a few years can make or break a team… and
      that if a team does its homework, they can still build a cup contender
      without having the 1st or 2nd overall pick, though that helps…

      people (fans & media) tend to get more excited about July 1 free agency
      and the NHL trade deadline than the draft… not every pick will work
      out, but some teams make more fatal errors than others…

      even if the Habs made one of the picks I pointed out different, it would
      have made a huge difference… and you have to admit, David Fisher is
      perhaps the worst 1st rounder in Habs history (OK, going back past 30
      years at least)… not only is he a bust, the Habs didn’t even bother
      trying him out in the minors (AHL or even ECHL) before cutting him
      loose…

      I’m not a Price basher, but Kopitar is a type of centre the Habs have
      been missing for a decade or so…

Comments are closed.