Montreal 3 Washington 6 (Bell Centre)
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” ~Albert Einstein
When the pundits did their pre-series checklists, it was suggested that the Canadiens’ second-ranked power-play should be able to exploit a very weak penalty-kill with Washington ranked 25th in the league.
Despite being a defense liability on every shift, we are told that Marc-Andre Bergeron is a must in the line-up because of his booming shot. Yes, Bergeron was a minus three tonight, and is already minus eight in this series. But, he is power-play specialist, and his contributions outweigh any negatives about his defensive play. That’s a given, isn’t it?
Would you be surprised to learn that Bergeron has zero power-play goals in the post-season and only one power-play assist? Let me go one step further to challenge this myth. How do you feel about Bergeron having two power-play assists since the Olympics (including the post-season), and one power-play goal in 2010?
How many goals against do you think Bergeron has been responsible for in that time? We can start with the giveaway that led to Jason Chimera’s goal tonight, and work backwards. We’ll still be counting after the season comes to an end.
Having successfully tackled that myth, perhaps we should look for more? Listening to the chatter after the game, I was convinced that Roman Hamrlik was solely responsible for tonight’s loss. Apparently he is old, slow and fatigued after a long season.
Hamrlik was guilty of the turnover in the offensive zone which led to the Capitals’ forward Mike Knuble scoring a short-handed goal with 6.3 seconds left in the second period. The Canadiens had dominated the second period outshooting Washington 21-to-9. It was a devastating moment for the Habs, and undoubtedly, it was the turning point of the game.
So, if Hamrlik is indeed so old and slow, why is he regularly deployed on the power-play by the coaching staff? It must be for his offensive statistics. Let’s take a look. Hamrlik has one power-play assist in the playoffs. In the regular season, he only tallied two power-play goals.
What about Josh Gorges? He plays the point on the power-play too. Regular season and playoffs, Gorges has three power-play points. Interestingly enough, Sergei Kostitsyn has the same number of power-play goals this season as Gorges, zero. Yet as we know, Kostitsyn has been effectively banned from playing when his team has the extra man.
The head coach tells us that forwards on the power-play point are a risk to giving up the short-handed goal. Yet, Hamrlik has been responsible for two very significant short-handed goals in consecutive games, and what is his upside?
Can we agree that this would be a better team with Sergei Kostitsyn on the point of the power-play? Alternately, Mike Cammalleri could be used at the point with Kostitsyn on the half-wall to take advantage of Sergei’s superb passing skills.
So, isn’t fair to say that the Canadiens didn’t take advantage of a major chink in the Capitals’ armour? By his decisions, Jacques Martin did not put his team in the best position to win. Instead, he stubbornly stuck to things that hadn’t worked all season.
The same can be said about Martin’s line-up decisions.
When asked about sitting Ryan O’Byrne for the first three games of the series, Martin responded that his young defenseman had a lack of confidence. Apparently, the press box is well-stocked with the writings of Maslow on self-esteem. It seems that it didn’t occur to Martin that singling out O’Byrne for mistakes wasn’t really helping matters.
Playing tonight under difficult circumstances, O’Byrne led the team in hits, with seven, in only 13 minutes of ice-time. Despite playing eight minutes less than Gorges, they each had four blocked shots, the most on the Canadiens. Remarkably, O’Byrne had the same number of shots on goal as Andrei Markov. As you might expect, Markov played 16 minutes more than O’Byrne.
Suffice to say, it’s not easy to find good reasons that O’Byrne was not in the line-up since the start of the series. Conversely, there are some obvious ones for his inclusion.
It’s likewise for Sergei Kostitsyn. The younger Kostitsyn was excellent tonight and finished the game at a team high plus two. That is an impressive statistic given that he was exiled to the fourth line and only played eight minutes.
Isn’t that an improvement over the contribution of Mathieu Darche with 2:22 of ice-time in game three?
While some players are victimized by the coach, others get a free pass. Benoit Pouliot has played dreadfully in this series. He has been very soft on the puck. Somewhere, Pouliot has picked up a “Get Out of Jail..err, 4th duty” card and has remained on the second line. He looked lazy on Alex Ovechkin’s second goal tonight.
There is a stubbornness about this coach. Still not convinced? Could primary responsibility for the position in the series rest with Martin?
Coaching is about motivation, instilling confidence, preparation, strategy and adjustments. Which quality is a strength of Jacques Martin?
After the last minute goal in the second period, did the Canadiens come out of the intermission refocused? The Capitals outshot them 20-to-6 in the third.
In a game with slim margins, attention to detail is very important. Why did Tyler Sloan, the Capitals’ most vulnerable defenseman see a steady diet of the Canadiens’ third line during his 16 minutes of ice-time? Keep in mind, that coach Martin had the last change.
When Semyon Varlamov was a rebound machine in the first two periods, why weren’t the Habs coached to go to the front of the net for screens and second chance opportunities? Certainly Varlamov played well, but was he really tested when he looked like he could be beat?
On the Washington bench, Bruce Boudreau made adjustments that paid dividends. He put a struggling Alex Semin together with Ovechkin and the pair combined for the third Capitals’ goal. To protect a lead with his team on the power-play, Boudreau replaced Ovechkin on the point with Tom Poti and sent out his best defensive forward, Brooks Laich.
Don’t get me wrong, execution matters and for that the players should be held accountable. But it is the responsibility of the coach to put his players in the best position to succeed. The coach must learn from his mistakes and make adjustments.
The frustrating part for fans is the apparent unwillingness to learn and adapt.
For 86 games, we’ve watched the coach try to hammer a round peg in a square hole. Tonight was no different. It didn’t work again, and yes, that is insane.
Game five is Friday in Washington with the Capitals leading the series 3-to-1.
Rocket’s three stars
1. Nicklas Backstrom
2. Alex Oveckkin
3. Bruce Boudreau
Special mention: Semyon Varlamov, Carey Price
Aside
The head coach has a defender. On Wednesday in La Presse, in a poorly argued article, it was written that Jacques Martin shouldn’t be blamed because his doesn’t have anything to work with this season. The author, a well-known bigot (who isn’t worthy to be named here) said that this year’s talent is no better than an expansion team. I wonder how many expansion teams had five players above the five million dollar salary level (adjusted for year of entry)?
The article goes on to say that Martin almost won something one year in his career, which is better than the coaching records of the Canadiens during the past 15 years. Apparently the author doesn’t understand that the statement skewers the hiring policy that he so vehemently protects.
Player quotes from wire services were used in this report.
(photo credit: Getty)
~This article is available for your listening convenience via All Habs OUT LOUD. Use the player below or download to take it with you from the link in the sidebar.~
Bang on!
Nothing more to add. Oh, maybe… go read (again if you did it before) Kyle Roussel's excellent 22 reasons to fire Jacques Martin: http://www.cowhideandrubber.com/22-reasons-to-fire-jacques-martin
PS: I really like your 3rd star. ;)
So among my "22 reasons to fire Jacques Martin", how many of them did he commit in one single game? You could probably argue that he touched upwards of 10 reasons. Have we seen enough yet?
On Attaque a Cinq after the game, the lunkheads were arguing that the Canadiens needed more francophones in order to attain success. Hmmm, that's curious. Consider the following:
1- Benoit Pouliot seems to believe that because the paycheques have stopped coming, so should the effort,
2- Maxim Lapierre has been Mr. Invisible all year,
3- Mathieu Darche, God love him, has shown why he's a career minor leaguer,
4- Marc André Bergeron may as well be wearing the other team's jersey
5- Jacques Martin. 'Nuff said.
And we need more? Maybe more of the good ones, but not more for the sake of having more. There is no mystique among French born players when they wear the CH. If there is a mystique, it's the type that has them caught like deer in the headlights rather than all-stars.
I know the discrepancy in points between the Caps and Habs is huge, but is anyone else bothered by the fact that with the exception of the Sens, all of the other underdogs are either up in their series, or tied?
When we look at the numbers, we'll see that many of the guys actually put up some decent numbers; take your first gulp of kool aid. Then we'll rationalize that the Canadiens won game 1 (deservedly so, but by and large thanks to Halak), woulda/coulda/shoulda won game 2, and were in games 3 & 4 except for one horrid period. We'll delude ourselves in to thinking that "if only this team can play 60 minutes…"
Chug-a-lug the kool aid once again.
The simple fact of the matter is that this team has far too many flaws, and has had them since October. They're fatal flaws, and unless Gauthier breaks out the jackhammer again (or unless the Molsons do it for him), we'll all be mixing up another big batch of kool aid for next year.
This loss was entirely on the staff, and crazy angry caller "Sal" was right that these guys will lose the series because of the staff. My brother and I were arm-in-arm terrified every time Hamr and Bergeron were out there. The staff is either blind, stupid, or sadists to keep putting them out there..
Every time this team gives up a shorthanded goal it's usually because of Hamr or Bergeron. Absolutely insane…
Stop me if you heard this one before: A forward cruises down the left wing and sends an easy wrister right into the gut of the goalie. And so different forwards repeatedly try and try again the same move. Maybe the blind and stupid of the staff is contagious…
It's disappointing because Metro, Sergei, Moore, Gio, Cammy, all D not named Hamr/Bergeron, and Price played a hell of a game.
But being there I was proud of the crowd around me. They were loud, proud, and supportive. Everyone seemed to come in with a positive attitude even though they knew the team was in way over their heads. And for a while it looked like things were going the right way even with the refs calling whatever they felt like (I mean, wow, the Caps had 6 players on the ice for a very long time). The two empty netters were killer though. I'm still laughing at how the majority of the lower bowl ran away and totally missed Moore's goal. Would have been awesome if they managed to tie it the second time…
Comments are closed.