(photo credit: Pierre Obendrauf, Gazette)
Those of us at the Canadiens’ practise today in Brossard were treated to a unique moment. While reporters spend their time challenging members of hockey teams, there is rarely an opportunity for players and coaches to send messages back. When it happens, it usually ends badly. Think Rangers coach John Tortorella with New York Post scribe Larry Brooks.
Close to the end of the practise, Carey Price skated towards Andrei Markov near center ice and gave him a big bear hug. Price then glanced up to the media gallery with a grin. Message sent, and done so brilliantly.
Yesterday, on the Team 990, morning host Tony Marinaro reported a “scoop” that after the Canadiens game with the St. Louis Blues which the Habs lost in overtime, Markov said to Price, “If you’re not going to play with heart, we don’t need you, go home.”
Marinaro also reported that players joined in on each side. Tony then spent the rest of the show talking about a divided dressing room, players not being able to work with each other, and inferring all sorts of ramifications of such an incident.
As I posted yesterday on Twitter and at The Montreal Forum, I don’t doubt that parts of this story are true. For that matter, the quote may even be close to accurate. What bothers me was the spin being trumpeted by Marinaro.
If words were exchanged between Markov and Price, so be it. It is something that happens all the time in professional sports, especially following a tough loss. The reality is that the players probably forgot about it soon after. Other players joining in the argument or trying to calm things should not be interpreted as players lining up behind one player or the other.
If the quote is true, it is somewhat odd that Markov would have questioned Price on the night he was willing to drop the gloves with Blues tough guy Cam Janssen. Also keep in mind, the Markov could have been upset at himself when he had the opportunity to score in overtime. And in calm reflection, Markov probably would recognize that. But this was a heat of the moment. A snapshot. Yet Marinaro chose to promote it as a divisive event.
Imagine yourself at work, at home or socializing. Are there any snapshot moments that, taken out of context, could be misinterpreted if examined by one self-interested media personality along with a group of enthusiastic but not always logical sports fans?
I also think that Marinaro knew exactly what he was doing. I have never seen the amount of irrational hatred for a franchise player as there has been in Montreal towards Price. Marinaro knew the attention he would get personally by lighting the match to an already volatile situation.
Trying to be the news rather than reporting it is irresponsible and unprofessional in my opinion. We already have far too many examples of that in Montreal and it is very disappointing to see Marinaro join their ranks.
I don’t expect that Marinaro would reveal his “solid source” but if it was Georges Laraque as some have alleged, does that taint our opinion of the information? Laraque was dumped by the team the day after this supposed incident. And we can’t deny that Laraque is more interested in off-ice drama than his job on the ice. In that case, is it any more than a case of sour grapes?
Marinaro’s Team 990 colleague, Mitch Melnyk, reported that Tony’s source was someone outside the Canadiens locker room. “The fact that it leaked out (not by anybody in the Habs dressing room) is terribly unfortunate.”
Laraque is no longer in the Habs dressing room but would have been there the night of the incident. I suppose that Melynk could be talking about Laraque. But, there are other possibilities.
If we speculate a little, and this is only speculation, can we imagine a scenario where Jaroslav Halak’s agent Allan Walsh provided information to Tony about this incident? Does Walsh fit Melnyk’s description? Is there any history to go on? In the past, has Walsh ever tried to ignite a story that was intended to trash Price, and advance his client? Hmmm.
During the reporting of his ‘scoop’, there was something else that Marinaro said that really bothered me. He claimed that players may be treated more favorably in the media if they were a source of information. Marinaro said it as if it was a well known reality. That may be Marinaro’s way of doing business but I don’t buy it as a universal practise.
So, continuing with our earlier example, if Alan Walsh is one of Tony’s sources (and I’m not saying that he is) then Halak would receive favorable press. So when I hear certain media praise one player and criticize another, am I left to wonder if it is only because the player has or hasn’t provided information? I believe that Marinaro has just skewered his own credibility without realizing it.
After the practise today, the media were anxious to get reactions from the players. For his part, Markov wasn’t playing along.
“If you’re looking for bad story,” said Markov, “you find the wrong guy. Sorry.”
Markov continued, “You’re supposed to help us right now because we have a tough time right now. But anything happen in the room is going to be stay in the room.”
When asked about the embrace from Price, Markov said “We are family. We love each other. We’re going to have lunch together after that.”
And so it goes. Besides someone’s personal ambitions, this was much ado about nothing.
you said it well.
I couldn't care less about the spats in the locker room – I just want these guys to WIN hockey games.
990 is getting on my nerves – I refuse to listen to their garbage anymore.
same for the anti-chambre! bleh!
It's odd to me that someone like Tony, who I have come to respect, would go with a story like this.
"To get his name in the news"
And?
What will that get him? More listeners? A TV gig? What exactly is his benefit?
Sure, his name trended on twitter, so he got some eyeballs and some attention.
And?
We'll never know now what happened. I didn't really expect to find out the truth, but what's certain is that we knew the players would, on the surface, brush it off.
All this means to me is that I'll have to pay more attention to Marinaro's "scoops" from now on.
I am running with the assumption that (or at least I was running with) the assumption that what he said was true, up to and including the divide in the locker room. It seems that it was just one guy calling out another. That's nothing and we've seen it 3 times this year already.
It's also curious to me that Melnick reported that the source was outside the dressing room. Who is his source for this? Tony says it's from inside, Mitch says it's from outside. Who to believe here, using evidence as the barometer?
Moving on to the point of irrational hatred in Price, I couldn't agree more. The big question is can the "haters" be converted once again? I don't know if that's possible at this point. Crazy fans don't like to admit when they are wrong. Every single goal against is now an opportunity to slam Price and feed the hatred. Every game he doesn't steal, every time his shoulders slump, every monotone sound bite are just fuel for the anti-Price parade. It's hard to reclaim someone who has dug himself so deeply in one camp.
It's also fine and dandy for us to pore over the stats and circumstances as we do. I feel that we have looked at this in a way that goes beyond the W-L records. At a certain point one party is permanently converted, while the other side tries to keep the sand from trickling through their fingers.
If you've ever subscribed to the old axiom that "perception is reality" then the reality is that Price is a bad goaltender, because as we are bearing witness to, there is a massive tidal wave of hate being heaped on Price right now. Again, I'm not agreeing with this, but simply put:
If perception = reality, and the growing perception is that Price is no good, then Price is no good.
Of course, that viewpoint is subject to belief in the saying, and recognition in the fact that it's limited to the increasingly boorish market of Montreal.
I'm truly disappointed in what many fans are saying and believing. I thought we were smarter than this, but we're just as irrational and myopic as Yankees fans, it would seem. Sad.
Personally I've stopped listening to Marinaro a long time ago. He's more repetive than the Habs…
Only guys I tune into regularily are Tieman and Melnyck.
Heated spats are normal. Marinaro's spin on it was utter stupidity. It reeks of the "super scoop" concerning the Kostitsyns and Hamr being friends with a guy who turned out to be a mafia drug dealer.
Simply put; Tony Marinaro has always been an "over the top" self-promoter.
If someone throws enough spaghetti noodles against a wall, they're bound to have one or two noodles stick. Marinaro only mentions the noodles that actual stick….there's no mention of the hundred noodles which fall.
I have also become fed up with his constant restaurant or store promotions (they aren't all paid ads people) to get freebie.He is always asking his listeners for a "great deal" on renovation work or a TV….etc.
As you mentioned Number31, I enjoy listening to Tieman (glad to see Stock gone!!) and Melnyck but I'm growing very tiresome of Marinaro's "me,myself and I" act of broadcasting.
Very good piece by Ken Campbell over at the hockey news. Seems Bob was going to trade Price, Pleks and a prospect for Kovy2, but the deal was axed by Bettman. I guess Price is as likely to get traded as is Halak after all.
Comments are closed.